The Return of Real Assets: Why Tangible Value Is Regaining the Upper Hand
- Lorenzo De Sario
- 6 days ago
- 4 min read
Executive summary. As rate volatility abates and price discovery returns, European investors are rotating—selectively—toward real assets (real estate, infrastructure, and digital/energy platforms). Liquidity remains uneven, but deal pipelines and capital-raising signals point to a slow rebuild of confidence, especially in pooled vehicles and essential infrastructure exposed to secular demand (AI, electrification, logistics).
1) What counts as a “real asset” (and why that matters)
In this piece we use real assets to mean income-producing real estate, infrastructure (transport, energy, digital), and selected tangible platforms (e.g., data centers)—typically accessed via non-listed funds, private REITs, co-investments, and asset-backed structures. Capital raising into non-listed European real estate has pivoted back toward pooled vehicles, a notable shift from 2023.
2) The market backdrop: from price discovery to cautious re-risking
Transaction volumes are improving off the trough. Savills’ preliminary read shows ~€95bn in H1 2025 (+11% YoY), with ~€50bn in Q2 alone (+8% YoY), while commentary still calls the liquidity “low but improving.” This is consistent with a tentative return of institutional interest as pricing clarity improves.
Recovery is uneven. MSCI notes Q1 2025 was a stall for European CRE sentiment amid borrowing-cost jitters; the broader 2025 recovery thesis is real but selective.
Implication: This is not a “risk-on for everything.” Investors are rewarding income visibility, operational resilience, and capex discipline—not mere beta to falling yields.
3) Where capital is going now
Pooled non-listed vehicles regained share for European strategies in 2025, reflecting LPs’ preference for diversified access and professional governance.
Digital infrastructure sits at the crossroads of AI and electrification. CBRE expects a record European capacity roll-out in 2025 (c. +937MW, +43% vs 2024). Constraints: land and power.
The power bottleneck is real: Europe’s data-center electricity demand may triple by 2030 (to ~35GW IT load), implying heavy grid investment.
Read-through: “Essentiality” is the common thread—assets linked to indispensable services (housing/logistics, power, fiber, compute) attract capital even in cautious markets.
4) Inflation, indexation, and the (limited) hedge
Real assets are often described as inflation-resilient, but reality is nuanced:
Lease indexation is widespread in continental Europe, mechanically passing CPI into rental lines—helpful for many landlords through the recent spike.
Private real assets (esp. infrastructure) showed stronger inflation resilience than public proxies in recent studies, although composition matters
That said, broad “real assets” indices did not perfectly hedge the 2021–23 inflation burst—manager selection and structure made the difference.
At the company level, leading infrastructure owners report contracted, inflation-linked cash flows underpinning results—a micro proof-point of the mechanism.
Takeaway: Real assets can mitigate inflation risk when cash flows are explicitly indexed (or have regulated pass-throughs). They are not a blanket hedge; underwriting and structure determine the outcome.
5) Risks you must price (before you re-risk)
Refinancing/valuation risk: parts of European collateral remain under pressure; the path out is asset-by-asset, not a monolith.
Power availability and build-cost inflation in digital/industrial assets can cap growth even when demand soars.
Policy and permitting will decide the pace of energy/digital build-out; time-to-connect often dominates spreadsheets.
6) What sophisticated allocators are doing
Large private-capital platforms are leaning in where Europe has structural underinvestment (digital infra, energy transition, select real estate), with 2025 deployment in Europe setting new records for some players—signaling confidence in long-duration, tangible themes.
7) The CGPH approach: structure before yield
As the first investment bank specialized in real estate and tangible-asset investments in Europe, CGPH Banque d’Affaires applies a multidisciplinary model—lawyers, financial analysts, accountants, and former CFOs—to align legal, fiscal, and financial architecture before capital is committed.
How that translates in practice:
Indexation & revenue quality: favor assets/contracts with explicit CPI or tariff pass-throughs (where regulation and counterparties permit).
Debt strategy: match asset duration and cash-flow stability with fixed or hedged liabilities; avoid short-maturity cliffs in assets with long life. (General best practice, consistent with market commentary.)
Digital & energy convergence: prioritize fiber+power or compute+renewables stacks where demand is policy- and technology-supported but underwriting is disciplined on capex and grid timing.
Access vehicles: use non-listed funds/private REITs or club deals when governance, fee stack, and visibility justify it—consistent with 2025 capital-raising patterns.
Philosophy: Yield follows structure. In 2025, that’s not rhetoric—it’s risk management.
FAQs
1) Are real assets “safer” than public markets? They can be less correlated and offer contracted income, but they carry illiquidity, refinancing, and policy risks that must be priced. Evidence of improving—but still selective—liquidity supports a disciplined approach.
2) Which sub-sectors offer the clearest visibility today? Leased housing/living, logistics, regulated/contracted infrastructure, and digital platforms with line-of-sight to power/connectivity—each with careful capex and grid underwriting.
3) Do real assets hedge inflation automatically? No. Mechanics matter. European lease indexation and regulated tariff frameworks help, but broad indices did not perfectly hedge the 2021–23 spike. Manager and contract selection drive outcomes.
In a cycle defined by selectivity and duration, advantage belongs to investors who engineer their exposure—not those who assume it. CGPH Banque d’Affaires partners with banks, funds, family offices, and HNWIs to design real-asset architectures where structure, cash-flow quality, and downside control come first. Let’s discuss how that framework could fit your mandate.
